Third Street Pedestrian Signs Confused Driver in Tuesday's Unusual 3-Car Crash
The following information was supplied by the Geneva Police Department. Where arrests or charges are mentioned, it does not indicate a conviction.
An Elgin driver's confusion over pedestrian-crossing signs on South Third Street contributed to Tuesday's three-car accident that pushed one vehicle onto the sidewalk next to the Geneva Post Office, Geneva police reports indicate.
Three drivers refused treatment following the accident that took place around 10:43 a.m. Nov. 13 at the intersection of James Street and South Third Street, reports said.
According to reports, a Chevrolet Malibu driven by Samsam Turkman, 65, of Elgin was travelling east on James Street and stopped at the stop sign at South Third Street as a Hyundai Sonata driven by Violeta Flores, 77, was travelling north on Third Street.
Reports said Turkman saw the yellow pedestrian crosswalk stop sign for northbound traffic, assumed that Flores’ Sonata would stop, and proceeded into the intersection. His Malibu struck the rear of the Sonata, which veered to its left into the northwest corner of the intersection, near the Post Office, where it struck a sign post, park bench and two large newspaper boxes, all owned by the city of Geneva.
The newspaper boxes then fell into a parked Chrysler Town & Country owned by Sandra Smith, 57, of Batavia. More than $1,500 damage was done to any one person’s vehicle.
Geneva Medic 251 arrived on the scene, but all three drivers refused treatment. Turkman was charged with failure to yield at a stop intersection and has a court date of Dec. 11, reports said.
Related Articles
Patch reports on law enforcement activity in Geneva, using information provided by official agencies. Persons charged with a crime, or issued a citation for violation of a local ordinance, are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. If you or a family member are charged with a crime or cited for a violation, and the charge or citation is subsequently adjudicated, we encourage you to notify Geneva editor Rick Nagel at rickn@patch.com and we will do follow-up reporting on the case.
Jeff Ward
4:10 pm on Thursday, November 15, 2012
The same thing happened to me, but I saw that the person crossing Third was gonna go and I slammed on the brakes. Those signs are a fricken' hazard and they need to be removed.
To make matters worse, the new pedestrian law isn't working. We need the GPD to start employing stings where they only pass out warnings. It's the only way motorists will learn.
Jeff
Arron Lee
1:19 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012
Jeff-
Being runners, we pay more attention to a pedestrians needs than most.
I agree the pedestrian law just flat out isn't working, but how often can these stings be run? I like the idea of one or two, right now, before the holidays hit our town. Especially with out of town visitors coming. But we can't put more stop signs up, there would be so many complaints about the flow of traffic and it could possibly hurt the downtown businesses.
I agree with you about the little yellow pedestrian stop signs. Too confusing! Again, with the out of town, holiday, visitors coming it could be even worse. They either need to change them to a yield sign or none at all. Or my favorite the little kid sign with the giant orange flag.
Arron
Jeff Ward
1:32 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012
Aaron,
If it weren't for experience I would absolutely agree with your it'll never change theory. But if you've been to California or Italy, it's become just a much of a habit for drives to stop for pedestrians.
Sure, the GPD will have to expend some effort, but eventually the mindset will change.
Jeff
Arron Lee
1:38 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012
Jeff-
I am from CA so I know this can be done. I have been pulled back off the street many many times. But incidents of jay-walking tickets are much higher there as well. So it has to go both ways. Designated walking ways for pedestrians need to be utilized for just that. So many times walking downtown I see people darting through cars.
Arron
Sue
4:53 pm on Thursday, November 15, 2012
Here's a thought, how about they put up a few stop lights along 3rd street? Trying to cross over 3rd anywhere is dangerous because you have to almost pull onto 3rd to see around the cars parked there. I'm surprised more people haven't had accidents along 3rd.
Jeff Ward
7:41 am on Friday, November 16, 2012
Sue,
I like your idea too, but the problem is, it costs around $200,000 to install one stop light. They ain't cheap and the city is make some effort to cut back.
Jeff
Chuck
6:42 am on Friday, November 16, 2012
Here's a thought, lets build a parking garage or a bigger one at the train station. Then close third street,or at least part of it and make it open space. It's such a cluster to try and drive through there with out of town drivers rubber necking and pedestrians just walking out in front of cars everywhere but the crosswalks.
Jeff Ward
7:40 am on Friday, November 16, 2012
Chuck,
I love your idea, but the businesses would never go for any part of Third Street being closed.
Jeff
craig
9:56 am on Friday, November 16, 2012
Chuck, business always suffer from these "malls" Many cities, Chicago State Street and Oak Park's Lake Street come to mind, have tried it unsuccessfully and re-opened those streets.
Crystal
6:58 am on Friday, November 16, 2012
Just put a few real stop signs on 3rd. I too have nearly been hit when driving on 3rd. A driver coming from the opposite direction assumed I had to stop because of one of those "temporary" signs. There were no pedestrians in sight but they misinterpreted the sign, assumed I would be stopping, started to turn left in my space and I had to slam on the brakes!
Colin C.
7:39 am on Friday, November 16, 2012
How many people know that it is the state law in Illinois that all pedestrians have absolute right of way at any marked intersection where there is no light, regardless? Why are so many drivers so clueless?
marsha engle
8:15 am on Friday, November 16, 2012
The stop sign/pedestrian walk ways are a hazard. I now know that folks will pull out thinking this is a four way stop. This happens to me two to three times a week. They need to be removed before someone is badly hurt. The accident on Third was a warning. Or get the "stop" off the yellow post and just say "yield" to pedestrians.
Paul Descoteaux
9:40 am on Friday, November 16, 2012
Marsha, There are a number of manufactures of these signs and you are correct, there are signs that don't have a "stop sign" printed on them. I agree with you, a sign that states "obey the law, yield to pedestrians" might be better.
Paul Descoteaux
9:25 am on Friday, November 16, 2012
Far to many people are not aware of the law. Laws on the books when we all received or renewed our Illinois Licenses. Colin has it right, pedestrians have the “right of way” with limits. With a speed of 25mph on 3rd St., accidents like the one above shouldn't happen at all. I wouldn't blame it on the sign.
The 3rd street signs (that we wouldn’t need if drivers obeyed the law) are there to remind and educate the drivers (vehicular) that our town is a pedestrian friendly. Unlike stop signs they aid to keeping the traffic flow moving. These signs are helping and are making a difference.
Paul Descoteaux
9:25 am on Friday, November 16, 2012
As guided by the The US Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration; http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/
And implemented by the Illinois Department of Transportation:
(625 ILCS 5/11-1002) (from Ch. 95 1/2, par. 11-1002) Sec. 11-1002. Pedestrians' right-of-way at crosswalks.
625 ILCS 5/11-1002.5
Amends the Illinois Vehicle Code. Provides that where traffic signals are not in place, vehicles must stop and yield to a pedestrian in a crosswalk rather than yielding the right-of-way by slowing down or stopping if need be. Provides that on a school day when children are present and so close that a potential hazard exists because of the close proximity of the motorized traffic and when traffic signals are not in place or in operation, vehicles must stop and yield to a pedestrian in a crosswalk rather than yielding the right-of-way by slowing down or stopping if need be to so yield.
Jim Radecki
10:39 am on Friday, November 16, 2012
More stop signs, traffic lights? Close third street? Are you kidding? Stop trying to legislate common sense. The accident happened because of an inattentive driver. Do we always have to look somewhere else to place blame? Maybe someone can sue the post office for placing the box too close to the street causing it to fall on the parked car.
Jeff Ward
12:16 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012
Jim,
The problem wasn't an inattentive driver - she was too attentive! Again the very same thing happened to me, but, thankfully, I saw it coming.
Those little stop sign images on those in-the-street warning signs are a really bad idea. I emailed the GPD six months ago offering my experience based reservations.
Instead of those silly signs, we need to employ the GPD's wonderful capacity for educating the public through written warnings. That's the only way will get drivers to reconsider years of pedestrians come in second conditioning.
I've talked with Commander Nash and that will be the subject of Monday's column!
Jeff
Katherine Filkins
10:40 am on Friday, November 16, 2012
I am so surprised more accidents don't happen. If we are trying to encourage a welcoming environment for shoppers, then we have to make it safe for them: 4 way stop signs on every corner. This should not be a street to hurry along. If you are in a hurry, take a different route. Geneva City Officials - please take action on this. And Jeff - don't go speeding along Third!
Katherine Filkins
10:46 am on Friday, November 16, 2012
I don't see adding stop signs as government intervention. I see it as creating a good environment for people to shop and spend their money on Third. Have you ever seen seniors try to see around parked cars to cross or turn on Third? Frightening and I am a senior!
Jim Radecki
11:32 am on Friday, November 16, 2012
I was on the Geneva City Council for 8 years and have read many traffic studies. The city actually had a full time traffic expert on staff for may years (Bob Smith). The first reaction to a perceived problem is to ask for a light or stop sign. On more than 1 occasion I was threatened that if I didn't vote for a stop sign and someone got killed it would be my fault. The reality is that state law controls how many stop signs or lights can be placed and thankfully so. Studies prove that more stop signs do not equate to improved safety. If placed too close together they actually cause more harm than good. More stops always mean more rearend accidents and people will go faster between stop signs if placed too close to each other. Traffic control devices are primarily to facilitate the flow of traffic. . Safety is the primary responsibility of the driver.
Jack
12:38 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012
Thanks, Jim, for the link to reality.
Drivers who proceed based on their assumption of what another driver will do are a huge source of accidents. If we could cut out rear-end collisions do to following too closely, and accidents like this one due to just not paying attention, it would make a huge improvement to our public and private safety, not to mention costs.
J.O.
11:49 am on Friday, November 16, 2012
Just put up stop signs. Low cost. Low confusion.
Jeff Ward
12:23 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012
J.O.
Shockingly, it's not that simple as I learned from the aforementioned Bob Smith.
Because so many municipalities put stop signs on every corner (see Westchester), the state stepped in and specifically defined where they could be placed. And based on my own experience trying to a stop sign at Cambridge and Pepper Valley Drives, I guarantee you those Third cross streets do not qualify.
There either has to be a certain amount of cross traffic, or there has to be a visibility issue as defined by specific tests.
The truth is, most of the stop signs in the downtown historic district would be illegal by today's standards, but they're grandfathered in.
Jeff
Koshka
1:44 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012
If we have a guy spending the day riding up and down the street marking tires for parking enforcement might it not be a good idea to put some police resources on enforcing an actual safety law.?
A law that should be enforced not just on 3rd Street but also on State Street?
Jon Azavedo
2:21 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012
I heard those signs went in because Tubby Burns needed extra time to waddle his royalness across the street. Speaking of Tubby, did he disappear after his resounding loss?
Bob McQuillan
3:40 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012
I don't have any expertise on this but I have noticed that if you are travelling east or west it is difficult to see cars on 3rd street because of the cars parked on 3rd. You need to inch out as far as possible and that defeats the crosswalk because you are sitting in the middle of it. I know parking is a premium downtown but is it possible to realign the parking spaces farther away from the corners. Won't cost anything except re-stripping. Also, I don't think all pedestrians understand they have the right of way and sometimes those that do just walk without even looking for cars.
Arron Lee
3:51 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012
I asked someone years ago what it would take to try to get the bike lane/routes similar to that of South Street by the PW bldg. and I was told, just for striping it was a crazy number. But yes, moving away from corners is a huge must. Especially, if you have a giant SUV OVER the line.